This should help show why it's ridiculous to blame
the rapid spread of the H5N1 variant on east Asia's
migratory birds. The gist of the argument is summarised
on the right of the map - birds wintering in the
south had departed South Korea and Japan before
their outbreaks began; hadn't even arrived in
southern areas (especially Indonesia) as outbreaks
began there. And China (crossroads for most of
the migration routes) didn't even report outbreaks
till January, well after the autumn migration
had ended.
In
the west of the area are openbill storks, which
nest at a few colonies in Thailand, during winter.
Some died this winter, and even before testing
positive for H5N1 (which was reportedly identified
in three carcasses) this incident was taken as
evidence for migratory birds spreading bird flu.
Trouble is, they migrate from Bangladesh/NE India;
and they feed in fields within one of Thailand's
worst-hit regions - making it surely the case
that local poultry farms were the source of the
virus; they were victims.
The
migratory-birds-are-to-blame case crumbles even
further when you consider that thousands of migrants
have been tested for H5N1, yet not one healthy
bird has yet tested positive. All wild birds that
have tested positive have been dead (or dying).
And dead ducks don't fly.
Extracts
from an article by Dr Martin Williams. Click
here for the full article.
For
more on bird flu see Dr Martin Williams information
page.
m
|